Konversations with Kapil
Hindu Jewish Unity
26/11/2008 has gone in history as the day the whole of India, and the wider world, awoke to the constant cross-border terrorism that India has had to face for decades. Some ten terrorists from Lashkar-e-Taiba, an Islamic terrorist organisation based in Pakistan, carried out a series of 12 coordinated shooting and bombing attacks in Mumbai that went on for four days. In the trail of this unwarranted terrorist attack on India, it left 164 people dead with some 308 more who were wounded.
Whilst most of the attacks were of public buildings frequented by a diversity of people, one people in particular had been singled out for their faith. This was at Nariman House. Locally also known as Chabad House which is a Jewish Centre. Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg and his wife Rivka Holtzberg, who was six months pregnant at the time, were murdered with four other hostages. Security forces who freed the Chabad House from this terrorist attack also lost lives and many were injured.
Photo of Chabad House the day after the attack.
In 2010 January I was honoured to accompany HRH Prince Michael of Kent on our visit to the Chabad to witness, and to hear, first-hand accounts of what actually transpired. It was also a clear sign of our support for the Jewish Community in Mumbai, and to the victims who suffered so greatly during that attack.
Photo: HRH Prince Michael of Kent being informed of the impact of the attack by Rabbi Avraham Berkowitz of the Mumbai Relief Fund. With me on the right.
I present this as my starting position since it crystallises for me the immoral attack that both Hindus and Jews have had to endure for decades. Hindus and Jews have lived side by side with our Muslim brothers and sisters for a long time. However, this resurgence of the militant Islamic ideology that has spread throughout the world now threatens all of us yet again. Our two communities are the most in danger from these terrorists since they view our communities as a direct threat. The Jewish community have endured more than a millennia of savagery from it’s neighbours, and almost always on grounds of faith and race. In similar vein, Hindus have endured more than a thousand years of invaders and their persecution. With this amount of murderous intent and persecution, both the Jews and the Hindus have survived. Once again, these two communities are beginning to rise up and rise above their historical disadvantage and are now leading the way in the world in all spheres of life. The values imbibed within these two communities of truth, righteousness, peace and love for the whole of humanity is a message that the world needs at this most critical juncture in time.
However, whereas in the past the attacks upon us were primarily physical, in the 21st Century we see these attacks being supplemented with the dark art of social media, political coercion and the wholesale distribution of militant Islam by way of the Petro dollar. In the last few years even the most ardent supporters of these extremist regimes have finally realised that this is now an unsustainable model that must be deconstructed if the world is to enter this new millennium with any hope of peace for the whole of humanity. Duplicity that has been the cornerstone of the work of the United Nations now has to be challenged. It is time that right-minded people, leaders with a moral and ethical spine, and the independent institutions come out and challenge the bigots on the world stage who thrive on terror and extremism. Silence is no longer an option. As Albert Einstein said rightly before, “The world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it”. Couple that with the words of the Mahatma, “When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time, they can seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall. Think of it–always”. And then we have the famous quote from Edmund Burke, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing”. Quotations are great, and these quotations are so often quoted by the very same people who hide their true duplicitous nature with a smile in the public arena. We the silent majority must now find our voice. Social media is great, but it has been taken over by the extremists from the far left and the far right. Increasingly the threat is in fact from the far left who have moved so far to the left, that they have morphed into the fascists of the 21st Century. Under the cloak of equality and diversity, they hoodwink the masses with their grotesque outrage at anything and everything. They have in fact become a pack of ‘mischief’ who are intent in causing as much mischief as they can under the camouflage of premeditated anarchy. The question arises, who is funding this global phenomenon? After all, does anyone seriously believe that it ‘just’ happens? Surely one cannot be that deluded!
In this era of orchestrated chaos and white noise, is it any wonder that we now have at the same time on the world stage, leaders like President Trump, PM Modi and PM Netanyahu. You must not confuse right of centre and nationalist leaders with the ‘far-right’. Everyone abhors the ‘far-right’ and rightly so. However, in the world the vast majority of the silent voters are beginning to find their voice by voting in politicians and leaders who are right of centre and those who wish to protect the people and the nation. I have listed three major leaders, but you are welcome to traverse the globe, continent by continent and you will soon see the dynamics at play. However, in countries like France, Greece, Italy, Spain and Poland we have seen a move whereby the frustrations of many people are now leading them to support far-right parties that are beginning to make inroads into mainstream politics. For Europe at least, the warning signs cannot be clearer or louder. Ignore them, as in the past, at your peril. Don’t be too surprised to see the opposite in some countries where far-left and socialists come into power with their own agenda of governance by anarchy.
There are but two options for the world order. Either there is a global re-alignment which ensures that duplicity over terror and extremism, whether it comes from a religious ideology or from a political ideology, is tackled head on and put in check. Or there will be a violent reaction from the grass roots that will overwhelm many of the nations. We witness this churning in the European Union at present. Its leaders blinded by their own self gratification and the need to cling on to power by gerrymandering the social fabric of voters. However, the people at the grass roots are increasingly losing their patience. We have seen the eruption of riots in many of these countries. In some countries, no go areas have been created such that even the local Police are too frightened to patrol. The politicians and many of the intuitions with vested interested can ignore the people, but at their peril. And who are the people who will suffer greatly? Yes, it will be us the ethnic minorities. We will all be labelled under the same banner, we will all be attacked, and we will all pay a price for the crimes of the few. The PC Brigade that appears to champion our cause are in fact the very reason for our demise. They are, for all intents and purposes, the new imperial masters who have conquered the art of being your friends and having the capacity to brain wash our communities into believing that they have our interest at heart. Nothing can be further from the truth. Their aim is to usher in the most extremes of a socialist order where any form of challenge or disobedience will be met with wholesale bullying, harassment and abuse. We witness this already on social media and in how our streets are trampled on, at will, with protest after protest. They want to turn society into a paradise for anarchy, the arena in which they reign supreme.
So folks, be warned. I titled this piece for the Hindus and for the Jews. However, that which attacks these two communities today will also have the capacity to destroy the peace of the world tomorrow. Be warned, we allowed far right monsters to reap havoc with devasting consequences. We also allowed the far-left dictators space and they murdered millions for their ideology. The political elite of yesteryears are now out of touch with the people they claim to represent. Increasingly one is left with the view that the PC brigade’s dictum: ‘We do not need to be tolerant; you need to be tolerant to our intolerance’, is fast becoming the one and only commandment of the political left and of the socialist fraternity.
On the world stage we see how the United Nations has been hijacked by the extremist. They will pass Anti-Israel (Gaza related normally) and Anti-India resolutions (Kashmir related normally) for fun. Am I surprised when the United States recently declared that they were opting out of the United Nations Human Rights Council. I am surprised frankly that many other leading countries, including India and the UK, have not followed suit. If a nation appeases the extremists agenda at the UN in the hope for world peace, then they are sadly mistaken. Appeasement is the required first step for these agents of doom to systematically dismantle all international structures that have hitherto kept them in check. On the international plane the only two countries who have a sound moral and ethical compass that has passed the test of many millennia are India and Israel. Increasingly I am seeing that maybe the only protection this world has or will have is for these two bastions of humanity to forge a partnership to take on the extremists wherever they might be, and in whatever form they hide. Countries like the United States, and I hope the United Kingdom, will have to lend support overtly. The stakes are too high, and we cannot be complacent this time round.
So I leave you with one thought, that from Martin Luther King Jr, ‘He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it’.
Konversations with Kapil
In what can only be described as one of the most dramatic announcements in recent times, the representatives of many Interfaith national bodies in the United Kingdom came together to voice their grave concern with regarding to Grooming Gangs that exploit the vulnerable and target women of certain faith and ethnicities.
The letter below is self-explanatory and does not require this writer to add any commentary.
The following letter was sent to the British Hone Secretary, The RT Hon Sajid Javid MP on 5th June 2018.
A faith response: tackling religiously motivated sexual grooming
Joint letter sent to the Home Secretary 5th June 2018
As faith representatives, we support the ongoing efforts of Sarah Champion MP who has asked the government to take further steps in tackling the issue of child sexual exploitation. A recent letter coordinated by Champion dated 25 May 2018, and co-signed by a group of 20 cross party politicians requests the Home Secretary and Minister for Children and Families to do more for the victims of Britain’s sexual grooming gang epidemic.
The cross party group have requested the Home Secretary pays heed to the 2015 report Tackling Child Sexual Exploitation, and have asked the government to commission research into better understanding the ‘operation and motivation’ and ‘drivers’ behind sexual grooming gangs. We believe this is important, however we also believe some aspects of the ‘motivation’ and ‘drivers’ behind sexual grooming/child rape gangs are already abundantly clear.
Firstly earlier this year, a survivor of these rape gangs has confirmed she was targeted for being a ‘white slag’, because she was ‘non-Muslim’. Judges like Gerald Clifton who sentenced men in Rochdale in 2012, made a similar observation in sentencing remarks. He said the Muslim men had targeted their victims because they were not part of the offenders’ ‘community or religion.’A (2017) report from counter-extremist think tank Quilliam looked at 58 grooming gang cases since 2005, and found 84% were ‘Asian’, of which the majority were comprised of men ‘of Pakistani origin, with Muslim heritage.’
This analysis was preceded by the Jay report into Rotherham (2014), which concluded, ‘agencies should acknowledge the suspected model of localised grooming of young white girls by men of Pakistani heritage, instead of being inhibited by the fear of affecting community relations.’ The report concluded an estimated 1,400 children, (mainly white girls) had been abused by predominantly British Pakistani men. Muslim girls are rarely targeted, and despite authorities failing to recognise the phenomenon, Sikh and Hindu communities have been complaining about ‘grooming’ since the 1980s.
We as faith communities want the government to do the right thing and call out the motivation for the majority of sexual grooming gangs for what it is. We believe the evidence overwhelmingly points to an inconvenient truth. That is: non-Muslim girls (this includes Sikh, Hindu and Christian girls) have been systematically targeted in Britain due to a form of religiously motivated hate. We must have the courage to face the reality if we are serious about finding a solution to Britain’s sexual grooming gang epidemic. We support Baroness Warsi’s brave stance when she said, “a small minority” of Pakistani men see white girls as “fair game”, and ask the government to help the Muslim community tackle this stain on an otherwise law-abiding community, with appropriate funding if necessary.
Lord Singh of Wimbledon – Network of Sikh Organisations
Wilson Chowdhry – British Pakistani Christian Association
Satish K Sharma – National Council of Hindu Temples
Trupti Patel – Hindu Forum of Britain
Ashish Joshi – Sikh Media Monitoring Group
Mohan Singh – Sikh Awareness Society
The letter will certainly raise a huge debate in the corridors of power, but suffice to say, this phenomenon may not be unique to the UK alone. In the era of ‘#Metoo’ is it not striking that there is a deafening silence from the self-confessed champions of equality and diversity? One has to question their integrity, their honesty and the ethics on which they shout out so loudly on certain issues, but remain so silent on others. Surely, we cannot allow the faith of the perpetrators to hold society to ransom? We diminish ourselves when we pick and choose when to show our contempt. Protection of ALL women, regardless of their backgrounds, must be one of the cornerstones of any civilised society.
The Mother of all Elections – UK 2017
The UK has seen some incredible developments over the past few years. No sooner had PM Cameron won the public vote in 2015 that he declared the date for the EU referendum. Otherwise known as Brexit. At that time, I had advised the politicians that for the UK, Brexit was the right choice and indeed in my view, the British electorate would choose that as their preferred option. On Thursday June 23, 2016, the British electorate did exactly as I had predicted and voted to leave the EU. This set into motion a series of events that have hitherto never happened before. Within hours PM Cameron stepped down as the Prime Minister. He really had no choice since he backed the ‘remain’ campaign which obviously failed.
Of course, this led immediately to the selection of the next Conservative Party leader and therefore the new PM of UK. And what a battle that turned out to be with the likes of Boris Johnson, Michael Gove and Theresa May all throwing their hats in the ring. The victor as we now know was PM T May.
The Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats also lost their leaders at the same time and we had several months when every major party in the UK was scrambling to select their new leader. In the end the Labour Party chose MP Jeremy Corbyn and the Liberal Democrats MP Tim Farron.
The stage was set to action Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. The first step in the process of the UK leaving the EU. Months of turmoil with opposition politicians playing all the games they could, to if not halt the process, to slow it down to a crawl. In the end, PM May put the opposition to the sword in a parliamentary vote, and guess what, the Article 50 Bill passed in Parliament by a margin of 498 to 114. So much so for the defiant opposition that crumbled in the wake of ground reality, that being that the British public would not stand for any politician who stood in the way of the decision they had made.
Under normal circumstances one would have thought that the matter was settled and the British government should just get on with the task in hand. However, modern politics is no longer that straight forward. The opposition which has a majority in the upper house (House of Lords) declared that they would do everything to frustrate the process and by so doing, undermine the negotiating strength of the British Government for Brexit. The European bureaucrats in Brussels were loving this, knowing they also wanted to make life hard for Britain as well. As it turned out, most of the leading economic indicators continued to be favourable to the British economy. The doom merchants were being proven wrong as Britain continued to outshine most of its European partners.
The Scottish National Party (SNP) having already lost one referendum for independence wanted to instigate another one. The SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon saw an opportunity of the Brexit vote and used that to promote her favourite policy for independence. However, the continuous sniping by British opposition politicians finally pushed PM May to decide enough was enough. PM May out foxed not only the opposition, and the media, but also her own party members when she declared that she wanted a snap election to take place on 8th June 2017. In the UK, we have what is called a ‘Fixed Parliament Act’. In effect, it means an election take place every 5 years. If you want one earlier, then Parliament must vote by 2/3rd majority for it to take place. Generally speaking, this would mean getting the opposition to vote with the Government of the day. Of course, when PM May threw this gauntlet down she knew that the main opposition had no choice but to back her call for an early election. Namely, how on earth can any opposition run timid from an election? Even when it knows it’s in a bad way, political expediency means the Labour Party had no choice but to say yes.
The state of play for the main political parties is as follows:
UK GE17 – LATEST VOTING INTENTION
The above table indicates the current trend in voting intentions of the British electorate. It does not take a genius to conclude that short of a minor miracle, the Labour Party will be defeated with devastating ease. They say that on current polling the seat sharing might look like: Con=388, Lab=177, LDem=7 and UKIP=0. The SNP in Scotland = 56. In my view, there is much that can still happen. As they say a week in politics is a long time.
This is of course just an exercise in playing with numbers. My interpretation is kept simple. The Conservative Party will win with ease and have a significant majority to get most of its legislation through the next Parliament. They will have 5 years in which to cement in their advantage subject to their policies working out and the public don’t get tired of the leadership.
The Labour Party will be crippled to such a degree that either it will have to dump its current unpopular leader, Jeremy Corbyn and get in a centrist like David Miliband (yes you read that correctly) or the Party as it stands will have to split. One faction (supported by most of its MPs) will try to galvanise the centre ground in politics whilst the other faction will turn into a far-left party with its dedicated core voters synchronised with its far-left ideology. What we can say is that unless the Labour Party takes some very tough decisions, and quickly, it won’t get into power in Britain for a good decade and maybe even longer. Make no bones, this is now crunch time for the Labour Party, it’s very existence is now in question and if it fails then don’t be too surprised if a Centre Left Party emerges of a coalition of colours to challenge the incumbent Government.
What does all this mean for UK and India relations?
The answer in short, a huge opportunity to reset the relationship so it is fit for the 21st Century. Britain is no longer an imperial power with an Empire to govern. It is a small island, be it a very important and influential island, just off the coast of Europe. The fact that UK will be free of the EU means anything and everything is now on the table for discussions. The fact that India has emerged as an established 21st century powerhouse means it can demand, and it will get, what it needs. Be that from the UK or a host of other countries around the world lining up to cosy with the new India under the stewardship of its nationally popular leader, PM Modi.
Both these countries, linked by history of course, find themselves in very similar situations. Facing the 21st Century with new found freedom, new opportunities and renewed self-confidence. Deals are there to be made in the interest of both. India finds itself in a powerful position that it has not seen for thousands of years. I have no doubt that these two old partners will find a new working relationship based on respect and shared values.
Europe on the other hand is in dire straits. The free for all immigration policies of the past decade are now catching up with devastating consequences. The majority of European politicians live in their ivory towers. They hide behind politically correct rhetoric and platitudes ignoring the plight of their own people and the surge of negativity being unleased from the silent majority via the new social media networks. The establishment elite can no longer control information flow and the diet of misinformation it depended upon to hoodwink the electorate. The news media that has failed to properly scrutinise the so called politically correct rhetoric is also coming in for some legitimate roasting. When politicians fail their electorate, the media ignore the truth for want of being PC – then it’s only a matter of time before the inevitable happens. And this we have witnessed in France with the far-right leader Maria Le Pen being elevated to new heights of being able to challenge for the French presidency. Think about it, in a major European country like France there is a huge proportion of people so disenfranchised that they are willing to vote for the very extreme far-right group. That means at the very grass roots millions of citizens are shouting, enough is enough, ignore us at your peril.
Brexit does not make the British electorate racist. The French have not suddenly become racist. And we can say that for most European countries now. What we see and experience is a cry for help from a sizeable silent majority. Unfortunately, the downside being that many of us who are classified as immigrants end up getting the brunt of these failed political policies.
The challenge for the EU is to accept its mistakes and correct them urgently. In my view, they won’t do that with the resultant outcome, massive street wide public disturbances on a regular basis. In 2017/18, we will see the streets of Europe resemble war zone, and folks that is no exaggeration.
Back to the British election. The win for the Conservative Party is clear and so on 9th June a new era beacons and I for one would hope that for India and UK, it means a much more productive relationship that safe guards each country not only on the economic front, but also from the advances of extremism and terrorism.
The Labour Party in Britain has increasingly moved towards the Islamic community. In particular, towards the Pakistani community. It seems it is now very much reliant on the Pakistani community for votes en masse to ensure it secures some of their seats. This has created a situation whereby it is now seen by many as anti-Hindu and anti-Jew. Both of these communities are looking at the Conservative party as a natural home for them in the knowledge that at least there are some aspects of shared values and goals. The Labour Party born from the Unions is also seen to be edging ever closer to some militant unions and with that many of moderate voters feel left out. We see many of these voters begin to move away from the Labour Party in favour of the Conservatives. What is even more surprising is that the working-class roots of the Labour Party also feel that they have been abandoned by their own party. We have seen a sizeable proportion of this group voting for Brexit as well as UKIP (very much the right of right party in the UK). For India one could conclude easily that a defeat for the Labour Party is the best option. The Conservatives offer the best choice for the best partnerships now and for the future. I would not be too surprised if PM Modi builds on the excellent relations he forged with PM Cameron and can now enhance those with his interaction with PM May.
With Brexit on its way, and with the General Election on 8th June, I see my glass to be full. Half with new found freedom, half with new opportunities for the new millennial. This is a time to forge stronger bonds to protect the economy, but to stand firm against the disease of extremism and terrorism that affects both our countries.
Much has happened in the UK since my last column. The UK has voted for Brexit, PM Cameron has stepped down, PM May now leads the nation and whilst all of this was happening, people could be forgiven for missing a very important announcement for the Indian community. I bring to you the appointment of a good friend of the Indian community, a champion for the diaspora and now, the Lord Gadhia. To be accurate the title is: Baron Gadhia, of Northwood in the County of Middlesex.
I have known Lord Gadhia for a number of years and it was clear from the start that in him the Indian community had a champion of Industry, of Commerce, of Public Service and a man whose core is based on the values of Sanathan Dharma. Indeed, Lord Gadhia sought the blessings of the Rig Veda during his swearing in ceremony in the House of Lords. A first in British history.
Lord Gadhia is a British Citizen of Indian origin, born in Uganda and raised in the UK. His family came to Britain during the expulsion of 50,000+ Asians from Uganda in 1972. He was educated at Cambridge University and also the London Business School.
He is an investment banker and has worked with major banks like Barings, ABN AMRO and Barclays before joining Blackstone as a Senior Managing Director, and is an expert on BRIC economies.
Lord Gadhia has demonstrated an active record of public service deploying his financial experience, strategic skills and international networks for the benefit of public bodies and helping the UK’s public global business relationships. Indeed, he has been recognised as a “Young Global Leader” by the World Economic Forum, which convenes with world leaders in Davos.
In April 2016, Lord Gadhia was appointed by HM Treasury to the Board of UK Government Investments (UKGI), which brings together UKFI and all the other assets owned by the UK Government under one umbrella holding company becoming the Government’s centre of excellence in corporate finance and corporate governance.
Lord Gadhia has provided significant input in strengthening UK-India relations and has accompanied delegations to the subcontinent with former Prime Minister David Cameron, former Mayor of London, Boris Johnson and Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge University. He is a Member of the UK-India CEO Forum which was established during Prime Narendra Modi’s historic visit to UK in November 2015.
I met up with Lord Gadhia and asked him a few questions:
- What is your current position?
I now have, what is euphemistically called, a “plural” career. I thought this would give me greater flexibility and a better work-life balance, but I am busier now than ever, particularly given my recent appointment to the House of Lords.
On the private side, I am a Director of BGL Group, which owns comparethemarket.com. I also advise Intas Pharmaceuticals, a global generic pharmaceutical company headquartered in India which has just made the largest investment by an Indian company in UK, post-Brexit, of over £600 million.
- You have had an extraordinary journey from your birth country to your home now in the UK. Can you tell us a bit about your toughest challenges, your proudest achievements and of course, your incredible success as a businessman, and now also within the political arena?
It has been quite a journey from a village in Gujarat to the suburbs of London via the hills of Kampala. Having a triple identity – Indian origin, born in Uganda and raised in Britain might seem challenging for many but I see it as a unique advantage. The beauty of wearing “three hats” – either separately or all at the same time – is that you don’t feel confined to any one culture and you can transcend them all.
As a young banker, I lived through the collapse of Barings in 1995. It was a “Black Swan” moment for all of us working at Barings and, indeed, the City fraternity more widely. We eventually came through this difficultly but the whole episode taught me to “expect the unexpected” and this has helped me develop a sense of perspective about similar events.
- Who/What inspires you?
I am most inspired by people who have been successful and yet retained their authenticity. Whether it’s an investor like Warren Buffet in US, an entrepreneur like Sir James Dyson in UK or a politician like PM Narendra Modi in India. They all have a gift for articulating a powerful vision and at the same time they also demonstrably “walk the talk”.
- What has been the biggest obstacle in your career?
When RBS took over ABN AMRO, I found myself in a difficult situation. My team faced an uncertain future in a new organisation which had an ambiguous commitment to our business area. I was loathed to see our successful franchise lose momentum and break-up but I could foresee a period of slow but sure attrition ahead. Fortunately, I was able to find safe harbour for 50 people at Barclays Capital – but these type of large team moves, en masse, happen very rarely in the City.
- Who has been the biggest influence in your career to date?
It is difficult to point to a single individual but I would say that the quality of experience which I gained working at Barings in the corporate finance team during the 1990s has been an enduring influence through my subsequent career. I had the best training possible and worked with some outstanding individuals who have gone onto excel in different roles.
- What would you like to achieve before GE2020?
I would like to see all the political parties select more British Indian candidates for winnable seats in the House of Commons. There are currently 9 people of Indian origin (and one more if you count Bob Blackman MP, who is an honorary Indian and a great friend of our community). It would be wonderful if we could double this to 20 British Indians in the House of Commons by 2020.
- If you were Prime Minister, what one policy would you like to implement?
Our new Prime Minister, Theresa May, speaks of making Britain a great meritocracy, a place where advantage is based on merit not privilege; where it’s your talent and hard work that matter, not where you were born, who your parents are or what your accent sounds like. This is music to my ears.
British Indians were promised during the EU referendum that being outside the EU would enable more talented people, including Indian students and professionals to come to the UK. I believe this promise needs to be honoured.
- The Prime Minister considers you as a leading expert on UK Indian Diaspora relations, can you share with us your thoughts on the special bonds between the two nations and how this will develop over the coming decades?
It is no exaggeration to say that the next decade for Britain will be dominated by Brexit and therefore the bilateral relationship with India will be framed in this context. It is a defining moment in British history as we grapple with these new realities. We stand at a crossroads for the UK and its future relationship with the rest of the world. In this context, I hope that India will view us as: “a friend in need is a friend indeed” and recognise both the necessities and opportunities opened up by our departure from the European Union.
We also need to constantly work on the relationship and can’t be complacent. A respected Indian businessman described the UK-India relationship to me as being like a long married couple. We are so familiar with each other that it is easy to take each other for granted and sometimes we need to find a new spark to revive the relationship. I hope some of us can encourage those new sparks.
- Your faith is very important to you; can you tell us how it has helped you in your life?
Being anchored in a set of timeless values provides you with a sense of perspective and balance. I believe that both Dharma (right conduct) and Karma (you reap what you sow) are also good ways to approach other aspects of your life – be they personal or business relationships.
As a result, you shouldn’t seek to be “somebody” but achieve “something”. If you do your duty, then everything else will fall into place. In the political world this philosophy is sometimes considered as naïve. But we need to change that mindset and encourage more people to get on with doing the right thing.
- If you were marooned on a desert island, whichever historical figure would you like to spend your time with, and why?
Since being isolated on a desert island could become quite depressing, it would have to be an entertainer that has made me laugh the most: Robin Williams, a great comedian and actor from films like Good Will Hunting, Mrs Doubtfire and Dead Poets Society. And, together, we could seize the day.
KK: I trust you found my ‘Konversation’ with Lord Gadhia interesting. Watch this space as I bring many more interesting personalities to you over the coming months. Do remember, you can also follow me on twitter, though you might need to have a robust constitution since I don’t mix my words and can be rather blunt on occasions.
Follow me on Twitter: @kdudakia
Time the World Woke Up
As the world woke up on Wednesday 9th November, people got a shock of the century. Or did they? I accept the shock was real for the establishment both in the US, as well as many western countries. It was a shock for the paid liberal media that had thrown everything at Trump to destroy him and they failed. Yes, it was also a shock for the pollsters who frankly have still not learnt a simple lesson, the world paradigm has changed and therefore their traditional models just don’t work any longer. It was a monumental shock for the divas of show business who went out of their way to promote Hillary Clinton and demonise Trump. It was a shock because no one wanted to listen to the people. The establishment and the liberal socialist PC brigade forgot the people. All they wanted to do was preserve their elite power base by hoodwinking their core voters again. However, the Earthquake that started in the east in 2014, established a new era in world politics which many ignored at their peril.
So, let’s go to the epicentre of this global earthquake, India. The Indian paid media, political parties, show business and societal elite demonised the then CM Modi who was standing to be the Prime Minister of India. We saw them use every dirty trick in the book to undermine CM Modi, and we also saw the absurd scenario when even the BJP insiders were actively undermining his campaign. The media and the pollsters connived to present a negative picture of CM Modi, presenting polling that was totally skewed. Despite this mafia style attack on CM Modi, in May 2014 he did not just win the Indian election, in so doing he destroyed the very backbone of the corrupt opposition. The Indian people at the grassroots showed their contempt for the establishment. The opposition has still not come to terms with the thrashing they got in 2014.
That was the start. The huge upset reverberated throughout the world since the ‘establishment’ in many western countries wanted their pet poodle ‘Sonia’s Congress’ to win in India. They did not heed the message.
In June 2016, Great Britain had their EU referendum (otherwise known as Brexit). Again, we saw the same pattern. The media, political parties (here in the UK as well as the meddling politicians from the EU and USA), show business and societal elite demonised all Brexit voters. There was wall to wall coverage painting every Brexiter as racist, xenophobic and illiterate thugs. When the big day came, the ‘remainers’ – i.e. the establishment, started their celebrations showing the polls confirming that Britain would stay in the EU. Well we all know how wrong they all got that and their rhetoric failed in every way possible. The British people at the grassroots sent a message, listen to what we are saying. If you don’t, we’ll give you the political establishment a bloody nose. Today we see that even after such a humiliating defeat, the ‘remainers’ continue to do everything to thwart the will of the people. I have already stated, they do so at their peril. If they think Brexit was a bloody nose, then in GE2020 they’ll get a lot more than that if they don’t get their act together.
So, we come to the USA and November 2016. We have seen the very same events unfolding. The establishment refused to listen to the people. They refused to listen to common sense. They did everything in their power to ensure that the Washington click stayed in power, one way or another. They had become so corrupt that even when they could see the wholesale misadventures of Hillary Clinton, collectively they all turned a blind eye. Remember, Hillary had the media, show business, the establishment, big businesses all on her side. She also had the President, Barak Obama who became the first outgoing President to take such an active part in a presidential election. If that was not enough, even Michelle Obama took to the stage to influence (or was it to hoodwink) the ‘minority’ voters. Then we add on top the USD 1.3 Billion which the democrats spent in promoting Hillary. Yes, USD 1.3 Billion and they still lost.
So, what is going on? After more than 60 years of political match fixing in many of our western democracies, there is now a people’s revolt that is taking place. It is NOT the racists as the establishment will paint. They are NOT xenophobic and nor are they dumb. In the real world where we all live, you have some crazy people on the extreme left, on the extreme right and yes, even some in the middle. However, to paint vast groups of law abiding good people with such crass labels is not only wrong, it is defamation on a monumental scale. You cannot win any election with just the ultra-left, or the ultra-right – you also need the people in the middle (the silent majority), a fact many people ignored.
This wind of change is already present in France, Italy, Greece, Spain, Germany and don’t rule out Austria, Holland and Hungary. If the EU politicians don’t wake up, they are all in for a shocking future.
And so, we end with one clear exposition, Brexit was right for the UK. This is now our time to reset the country so we can take advantage of a new global paradigm. It’s time to be positive and brave. The bigger story is not that Trump won, but that almost everyone in what we call the ‘establishment’ is so out of touch with the grassroots. When Trump said, it was going to be Brexit plus plus plus, there was a clue for the establishment! Do they get it tough?